Light ROM 4/Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso/text/maillist/1995/1095.doc/000889_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Oct 16 08:39:41 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA007437981; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 08:39:41 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from yakko.cs.wmich.edu by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA007357975; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 08:39:35 -0700
Received: (from vidjunk@localhost) by yakko.cs.wmich.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA17781; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 11:32:23 -0400
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 11:32:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Joe <[e-mail]>
Cc: John Gross <[e-mail]>, Lightwave Post <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: AC, Joe, and Manny: Thanks RE: Rendering
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

> > Field rendering does not significantly slow down rendering. Chances are

> Hi John,
> I remember hearing that in one of the Stranahan tapes also, but the fact
> of the matter is, whenever I use field rendering, I experience nearly
> twice the rendering time.  So... my question is, how do you employ field
> rendering without adding substantially to the rendering times ??

I would like to know that also.

Joe Freeman the Video Junky
--
Joe <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]